01-20-2007, 03:22 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2007, 03:29 AM by goodkarmaco.)
Because there are lots of litlle religious types who do not have the heart to allow people to CHOOSE what they read or look at.
I support allowing free religous expression. Why do certain religious types not understand if they want freedom to express their beliefs they then must allow folks who want to express their sexual views that same freedom also. With certain tasteful limitations of course. Those being not allowing minors access to it.
In other words, if religous folks got their way and stamped out porn, then the folks who want to gather to express religion should have those privileges taken away to.
PORNOGRAPHY IS FREE CHOICE. You don't have to enjoy it.
Franciscan views are old fashioned. The year is 2007.
visit; cathousesofnevada.com
I support allowing free religous expression. Why do certain religious types not understand if they want freedom to express their beliefs they then must allow folks who want to express their sexual views that same freedom also. With certain tasteful limitations of course. Those being not allowing minors access to it.
In other words, if religous folks got their way and stamped out porn, then the folks who want to gather to express religion should have those privileges taken away to.
PORNOGRAPHY IS FREE CHOICE. You don't have to enjoy it.
Franciscan views are old fashioned. The year is 2007.
visit; cathousesofnevada.com