Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 8,991
» Latest member: douhua2233
» Forum threads: 139,846
» Forum posts: 159,711
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 384 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 384 Guest(s)
|
|
|
AdBrite |
Posted by: triumph - 07-20-2006, 12:13 AM - Forum: PPC / CPC / Affiliate Programs
- Replies (14)
|
 |
Anyone have any experience with AdBrite either as an advertiser or publisher? I have heard a lot about them recently, but am looking for some more informative insight before I jump in.
|
|
|
Pr7 |
Posted by: vicki2 - 07-19-2006, 07:21 AM - Forum: Domain Development
- Replies (6)
|
 |
I am reading the other thread, and tried to google PR7 and what you are talking about, but can't find a simple explanation. I know it might be a boring question to answer, but help me out, ok?
|
|
|
most successful parking program |
Posted by: zach - 07-18-2006, 09:04 AM - Forum: PPC / CPC / Affiliate Programs
- Replies (14)
|
 |
I have been wondering which parking program people have been having the most success with. Which do you find is the best and where do you park most of your domains?
I personally have had great success with Fabulous (because I have a large gambling portfolio and they offer high payouts for these names). I park other names at Sedo, but have never witnessed good traffic conversions.
|
|
|
Would changing of domain ownership affect SERP? |
Posted by: llegent - 07-18-2006, 08:31 AM - Forum: Search Engines and Marketing
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hi everyone, good day to you. I wasn't paying attention to this particular area until recently it just kind of sparks of my mind. Ok, my question is, if a domain has changed the ownership and reflected in the whois record, will this also affect the SERP for the domain or site(if already developed)?
Well, we all aware that google looks at the "aging" factor, so if the ownership is changed, wouldn't it appear to google that the domain is "new" in the sense that the domain is with "new" onwer? Or google just look at the "original" domain creation date?
Anyone has actually take note of this area? kind to share your experiences?
|
|
|
Booble.com |
Posted by: llegent - 07-18-2006, 08:22 AM - Forum: Legal Discussion
- Replies (25)
|
 |
Speaking of Dispute and legal claim issues, it sparks of my memory of the old days back in 2004 where google was taking the issue toward booble.com (adult search engine). In its email to booble.com, Google claimed that :-
Quote:Your use of the Domain Name and corresponding web site constitutes trademark infringement and dilution of Google's trademarks and unfair competition under federal and state laws. Further, your improper duplication of Google's trade dress on the web site will mislead consumers into believing that some association exists between Google and you, which tarnishes the goodwill and reputation of Google's services and trademarks. Your registration and use of the Domain Name is in bad faith pursuant to the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP") and is clearly designed to appropriate the goodwill associated with the famous GOOGLE mark in violation of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act ("ACPA"). In addition, you would not be able to demonstrate any rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name because you are using it to tarnish the GOOGLE mark.
Agreed that booble.com was created much later than google.com :-
Google.com domain was created on: 15-Sep-1997.
Booble.com domain was created on: 25-Nov-2001.
But hey, is that also to say that no one can own domain like :-
aooale.com, booble.com, coocle.com, doodle.com, eooele.com, foofle.com, hooahe.com, iooile.com, ,oooole.com, poople.com, qooqle.com...and so on??
Well, apparently, Booble.com is still "alive" till date! and they remain the direction as "adult search engine" that they set in the early stage.
|
|
|
|